Concept

Reassessment Requirements

Deyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 / (2) Gross Negligence Penalties versus Reassessing a Statute-barred Year

"It is important to recognize that the statutory requirements for reassessing a statute-barred year are not the same as the statutory requirements for assessing gross negligence penalties. While there may well be cases where the same facts could justify both the reassessment of a statute-barred year and the assessment of gross negligence penalties, it will not necessarily always be the case.\n\nThe right to reassess a statute-barred year is set out in paragraph 152(4)(a) of the Act. Unless a waiver has been filed by the taxpayer within the prescribed period of time, the Minister may only reassess a taxpayer in relation to a statute-barred year if “the taxpayer or person filing the return (i) has made any misrepresentation that is attributable to neglect, carelessness or wilful default or has committed any fraud in filing the return or in supplying any information under this Act […]”.\n\nThe requirements for reassessing a statute-barred year are met if the misrepresentation is attributable to neglect or carelessness, without the need to consider whether the misrepresentation was attributable to wilful default or whether the taxpayer committed fraud (which in and of themselves could also justify the reassessment of a statute-barred year)."

Related Ideas

  • Distinct RequirementsDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · (1) The Decisions of this Court and the Tax Court in Lacroix
  • Penalty CautionDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · (4) Should the Assessment of the Gross Negligence Penalties be Confirmed?
  • Penalty TestDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · (3) The Tax Court Judge’s Errors
  • Tax CourtDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · C. The Application of Lacroix
  • Deyab ComparisonDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · (1) The Decisions of this Court and the Tax Court in Lacroix
  • Lacroix FindingsDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · (1) The Decisions of this Court and the Tax Court in Lacroix
  • Gross NegligenceDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · II. Decision of the Tax Court
  • Tax LiabilityDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · A. Burden of Proof
Reassessment Requirements | Deyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 | Bifalgorithm | Bifalgorithm