Chapter

A post-spinoff amalgamation may taint the spin-off

From Deyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 by Sambif

Concepts

  1. Continuity Rule

    "S. 55(3.01)(b), deeming an amalgamated corporation to be a continuation of each predecessor for s. 55(3)(a) purposes, can potentially preclude access to the s. 55(3)(a) safe harbour."

  2. Shareholding Spin-off

    "Suppose that a wholly owned Holdco of an individual owns 100% of Opco and 70% of Subco, with the remaining 30% held by unrelated persons. In order to spin-off the 70% shareholding:\n\nthe individual

A post-spinoff amalgamation may taint the spin-off | Deyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 | Bifalgorithm | Bifalgorithm