Concept
Review Standard
Deyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 / III. Issues and Standard of Review
"[18]\n\nTo the extent that this appeal raises any questions of law, the standard of review is correctness. To the extent that this appeal raises any questions of fact or any questions of mixed fact and law (for which there is no extricable question of law), the standard of review is palpable and overriding error (Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33)."
Related Ideas
- Appeal IssuesDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · IV. Analysis
- Tax CourtDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · C. The Application of Lacroix
- Review StandardProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · In a thorough opinion, the court found that “the
- Appellate ReviewProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · Review
- Evidence ReviewProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · feet to a
- Proof StandardProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · feet to a
- Corporate LossesDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · (4) Should the Assessment of the Gross Negligence Penalties be Confirmed?
- Tax LiabilityDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · A. Burden of Proof