Concept
509 Users
Property: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 / 13.05[E][4][c], p. 13-84 (1982). Proof of actual harm, or
"509 users to search specifically for “Top 40” songs, which were inevitably copyrighted. Similarly, Grokster sent users a newsletter promoting its ability to provide particular, popular copyrighted materials. In addition to this evidence of express promotion, marketing, and intent to promote further, the business models employed by Grokster and StreamCast confirm that their principal object was use of their software to download copyrighted works. Grokster and StreamCast receive no revenue from users, who obtain the software itself for nothing. Instead, both companies generate income by selling advertising space, and they stream the advertising to Grokster and Morpheus users while they are employing the programs. As the number of users of each program increases, advertising opportunities become worth more. While there is doubtless some demand for free Shakespeare, the evidence shows that substantive volume is a function of free access to copyrighted work. Users seeking Top 40 songs, for example, or the latest release by Modest Mouse, are certain to be far more numerous than those seeking a free Decameron, and Grokster and StreamCast translated that demand into dollars. Finally, there is no evidence that either company made an effort to filter copyrighted material from users’ downloads or otherwise impede the sharing of copyrighted files. Although Grokster appears to have sent e-mails warning users about infringing content when it received threatening notice from the copyright holders, it never blocked anyone from continuing to use its software to share copyrighted files. StreamCast not only rejected another company’s offer of help to monitor infringement, but blocked the Internet Protocol addresses of entities it believed were trying to engage in such monitoring on its networks. … . II"
Related Ideas
- 517 CopyrightedProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · 13.05[E][4][c], p. 13-84 (1982). Proof of actual harm, or
- 516 UnderstandingProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · 13.05[E][4][c], p. 13-84 (1982). Proof of actual harm, or
- 514 ClassicProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · 13.05[E][4][c], p. 13-84 (1982). Proof of actual harm, or
- 515 LiabilityProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · 13.05[E][4][c], p. 13-84 (1982). Proof of actual harm, or
- 519 PurposeProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · 13.05[E][4][c], p. 13-84 (1982). Proof of actual harm, or
- 506 NetworksProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · 13.05[E][4][c], p. 13-84 (1982). Proof of actual harm, or
- 507 NotoriousProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · 13.05[E][4][c], p. 13-84 (1982). Proof of actual harm, or
- 504 ElectronicProperty: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 · 13.05[E][4][c], p. 13-84 (1982). Proof of actual harm, or