Chapter

The fence … was more likely a

From Property: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 by Christian

Concepts

  1. Tacking Findings

    "The defendants did not maintain the fence nor did the defendants make any use of the small area of land in dispute between the boundary line and fence. The upshot is that the circuit court failed to

  2. Burden Proof

    "Even though the circuit failed to make adequate findings, and virtually ignored the thrust of the defendants’ evidence as to tacking, the defendants are not entitled to an adverse judgment decision o

  3. Remand Procedure

    "To recapitulate, the circuit court’s opinion in many respects deftly navigates the marshy terrain of adverse possession jurisprudence. Yet, we believe that the circuit court’s opinion lacks essential

  4. Property Facts

    "The property in dispute is located on Gooseberry Road in the Snug Harbor section of South Kingstown, Rhode Island. Identified as lot 19 on assessor’s plat 88-1, the land is sandwiched between lot 20,

The fence … was more likely a | Property: Volume 1 Christian Turner Assistant Professor of Law University of Georgia School of Law eLangdell® Press 2012 | Bifalgorithm | Bifalgorithm