Concept
Bookkeeping Error
Chopp v. R., 98 DTC 6014, [1998] 1 CTC 407 (FCA) / Case tabs
"While the taxpayer was away on vacation during the summer of that year, his daughter, then an inexperienced bookkeeper, used a presigned blank cheque of his corporation’s bank account to pay an amount of $28,490.37 requested by the law firm representing her father to complete the purchase of his new home. The payment was erroneously posted as a corporate expense (legal corporate) while it should have been debited to the shareholder’s loan account. At all relevant times, this taxpayer’s shareholder loan account with the Corporation had a credit balance of not less than $150,000.\n\nAfter the error was discovered in 1991, the corporate expense was disallowed, the corporation was reassessed to increase its income by that amount and the taxpayer was also reassessed to increase his income by the same amount on the basis that the corporation had conferred a benefit upon him as shareholder pursuant to subsection 15(1) of the Income Tax Act."
Related Ideas
- Benefit PrincipleChopp v. R., 98 DTC 6014, [1998] 1 CTC 407 (FCA) · Case tabs
- Loan RecordsDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · A. Burden of Proof
- Shareholder BenefitsDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · II. Decision of the Tax Court
- Tax ReassessmentsDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · I. Background
- Tax LiabilityDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · A. Burden of Proof
- Loan ReconciliationDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · B. Adverse Inference
- Corporate LossesDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · (4) Should the Assessment of the Gross Negligence Penalties be Confirmed?
- Shareholder BenefitGreer – Tax Court of Canada finds a shareholder benefit regarding a transfer to an individual shown on the register as holding one of the 1000 shares | Tax Interpretations · Greer – Tax Court of Canada finds a shareholder benefit regarding a transfer to an individual shown on the register as holding one of the 1000 shares