Concept
Concept
Chopp v. R., 98 DTC 6014, [1998] 1 CTC 407 (FCA) / CRA expands its FAQ webpage on bare trust reporting
"\n\nCRA has updated its FAQ entitled \"Enhanced Reporting Rules for Trusts and Bare Trusts.\"\n\nThe updates include examples regarding the exceptions to deemed trust status set out in s. 150(1.31). In this regard, CRA notes that:\n\nS. 150(1.31)(a) “provides an exception where all legal owners hold property both for their own use and benefit and for that of the other legal owners. For example, a joint bank account held by family members for the use and benefit of each of them” – and CRA goes on to provide a more detailed example of two spouses who hold a joint investment account, invested in GICs and TSX-listed stocks, for which they are both also the beneficial owners.\n\nS. 150(1.31)(b) “provides an exception for circumstances such as where a parent is on title [to a principal residence] to allow a child to obtain a mortgage” – and CRA goes on to provide a more detailed example of a couple acquiring the legal and beneficial ownership of a home but their mother/mother-in-law also being on title.\n\nS. 150(1.31)(c) “provides an exception for circumstances where spouses jointly occupy a family home, but only one spouse is on title” – and CRA goes on to provide a more detailed example to this effect."
Related Ideas
- Trust ExceptionsDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · CRA expands its FAQ webpage on bare trust reporting
- T3 ReturnDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · CRA expands its FAQ webpage on bare trust reporting
- Filing ExemptionsDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · CRA expands its FAQ webpage on bare trust reporting
- CRA WebsiteChopp v. R., 98 DTC 6014, [1998] 1 CTC 407 (FCA) · CRA Publications
- Indemnity ApplicationDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · CRA finds that an indemnity given by a Canadian NRT beneficiary regarding a trust distribution received from the trustee did not cause s. 94(2)(d) to apply