Bifalgorithm post · Property · Fast-Fish and Loose-Fish

Legal Metaphors

Legal Metaphors (Property · Fast-Fish and Loose-Fish) — "A common man looking at this decision of the very learned Judge, might possibly object to it. But plou…

Ideas in this flowchart

  • The doctrines of Fast-Fish and Loose-Fish are presented as the two fundamental supports of human jurisprudence.
  • A common man might object to the learned Judge’s decision.
  • The two whaling laws are treated as universal principles underlying the Temple of the Law.
  • Fast-Fish concerns things whose possession makes possession the whole of the law.
  • The maxim that possession is half, and often the whole, of the law supports the Fast-Fish doctrine.
  • Examples of Fast-Fish include slaves, exploited workers, inherited territories, landlords’ wealth, and politically dominated peoples.
  • Loose-Fish concerns things not securely possessed and is applicable internationally and universally.
  • Examples of territorial Loose-Fish include America in 1492, Poland, Greece, India, and Mexico.
  • Rights, liberties, human opinions, religious beliefs, intellectual thoughts, and the globe itself are also described as Loose-Fish.
  • The reader is both a Loose-Fish and a Fast-Fish.
Feed/

Legal Metaphors

Channel

Property

1 page

"A common man looking at this decision of the very learned Judge, might possibly object to it. But ploughed up to the primary rock of the matter, the two great principles laid down in the twin whaling laws previously quoted, and applied and elucidated by Lord Ellenborough in the above cited case; these two laws touching Fast-Fish and Loose-Fish, I say, will on reflection, be found the fundamentals of all human jurisprudence; For notwithstanding its complicated tracery of sculpture, the Temple of the Law, like the Temple of the Philistines, has but two props to stand on. Is it not a saying in every one’s mouth, Possession is half of the law: that is, regardless of how the thing came into possession? But often possession is the whole of the law. What are the sinews and souls of Russian serfs and Republican slaves but Fast-Fish, whereof possession is the whole of the law? What to the rapacious landlord is the widow’s last mite but a Fast-Fish? What is yonder undetected villain’s marble mansion with a doorplate for a waif; what is that but a Fast-Fish? What is the ruinous discount which Mordecai, the broker, gets from the poor Woebegone, the bankrupt, on a loan to keep Woebegone’s family from starvation; what is that ruinous discount but a Fast-Fish? What is the Archbishop of Savesoul’s income of 100,000 pounds seized from the scant bread and cheese of hundreds of thousands of broken-backed laborers, all sure of heaven without any of Savesoul’s help, what is that globular 100,000 but a Fast-Fish. What are the Duke of Dunder’s hereditary towns and hamlets but Fast-Fish? What to that redoubted harpooneer, John Bull, is poor Ireland, but a Fast-Fish? What to that apostolic lancer, Brother Jonathan, is Texas but a Fast-Fish? And concerning all these, is not Possession the whole of the law? But if the doctrine of Fast-Fish be pretty generally applicable, the kindred doctrine of Loose-Fish is still more widely so. That is internationally and universally applicable. What was America in 1492 but a Loose-Fish, in which Columbus struck the Spanish standard by way of wailing it for his royal master and mistress? What was Poland to the Czar? What Greece to the Turk? What India to England? What at last will Mexico be to the United States? All Loose-Fish. What are the Rights of Man and the Liberties of the World but Loose-Fish? What all men’s minds and opinions but Loose-Fish? What is the principle of religious belief in them but a Loose-Fish? What to the ostentatious smuggling verbalists are the thoughts of thinkers but Loose-Fish? What is the great globe itself but a Loose-Fish? And what are you, reader, but a Loose-Fish and a Fast-Fish, too?"

Flowchart preview
Series cover
👍
0
0 comments0 shares

Sign in to view and post comments.