Bifalgorithm post · Property · 13.05[E][4][c], p. 13-84 (1982). Proof of actual harm, or
504 Electronic
504 Electronic (Property · 13.05[E][4][c], p. 13-84 (1982). Proof of actual harm, or) — "504 electronic files by universities, government agencies, corporation…
Ideas in this flowchart
- Grokster and StreamCast’s peer-to-peer software enabled file sharing that led to a copyright lawsuit.
- Peer-to-peer networks serve diverse users and support the exchange of digital files.
- Electronic files are associated with universities, government agencies, corporations, libraries, and others.
- Individual software recipients prominently shared copyrighted music and video files without authorization.
- Copyright holders brought litigation against Grokster and StreamCast.
- The plaintiff group included MGM, motion picture studios, recording companies, songwriters, and music publishers.
- The plaintiffs alleged that the companies knowingly and intentionally distributed software to enable copyright infringement.
- MGM sought damages and an injunction under the Copyright Act.
- Discovery revealed the software’s operation, the defendants’ business aims, and the users’ predilections.
- Grokster and StreamCast offered similar products based on different peer-to-peer technologies.
- Grokster’s software used FastTrack technology, a protocol developed by others and licensed to Grokster.
- StreamCast distributed Morpheus software, which relied on Gnutella technology.
- After installation, either software enabled users to send file requests directly to compatible computers.
- Peer-to-peer networks also have operational disadvantages.
- Searches may fail to reach every computer and therefore may not uncover all available files.
- Popular files may exist in redundant copies.
- Software creators have no incentive to minimize storage or bandwidth consumption, whose costs are shared by users.
- The content available for retrieval and user behavior are more difficult to control.
