Bifalgorithm post · Fuscalite · V. Conclusion

Appeal Disposition

Appeal Disposition (Fuscalite · V. Conclusion) — "Subsequent to the hearing, the parties notified the Court that if Mr. Deyab was partially successful then the…

Ideas in this flowchart

  • Final disposition of Mr. Deyab’s appeals
  • The appeal is allowed regarding the assessment of gross negligence penalties but dismissed in all other respects.
  • The parties agreed that no costs should be awarded in either this Court or the Tax Court if Mr. Deyab was partially successful.
  • The appeals are allowed without costs.
  • The Tax Court Judgment is set aside and the reassessments are referred back to the Minister for reconsideration and reassessment.
  • For 2007, taxable income is reduced by $82,501.
  • For 2008, taxable income is reduced by $113,200.
  • For 2009, taxable income is reduced by $115,858.
  • For 2010, taxable income is reduced by $167,035.
  • For 2011, taxable income is reduced by $11,308.
  • Applicable interest is consequently reduced for the specified income adjustments.
  • All penalties assessed under subsection 163(2) of the Act are deleted.
  • Mr. Deyab’s appeal is dismissed in all other respects.
Feed/

Appeal Disposition

No cover

Channel

Fuscalite

1 page

"Subsequent to the hearing, the parties notified the Court that if Mr. Deyab was partially successful then the parties agreed that no costs should be awarded in either this Court or the Tax Court.\n\nAs a result, I would allow the appeal, without costs, with respect to the assessment of the gross negligence penalties but otherwise dismiss Mr. Deyab’s appeal. I would, therefore, set aside the Judgment issued by the Tax Court and render the following judgment (which reflects the amounts as agreed upon by the parties at the Tax Court hearing and the deletion of the gross negligence penalties):\n\nThe appeals from the reassessments made under the Act for Mr. Deyab’s 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 taxation years are allowed, without costs, and the reassessments are referred back to the Minister for reconsideration and reassessment on the basis that:\n\n(a)\n\nMr. Deyab’s 2007 taxable income be reduced by $82,501;\n\n(b)\n\nMr. Deyab’s 2008 taxable income be reduced by $113,200;\n\n(c)\n\nMr. Deyab’s 2009 taxable income be reduced by the amount of $115,858;\n\n(d)\n\nMr. Deyab’s 2010 taxable income be reduced by $167,035;\n\n(e)\n\nMr. Deyab’s 2011 taxable income be reduced by $11,308;\n\n(f)\n\nthe amount of applicable interest should be consequently reduced in respect to the foregoing paragraphs (a) to (e);\n\n(g)\n\nall of the penalties assessed under subsection 163(2) of the Act be deleted; and\n\n(h)\n\nMr. Deyab’s appeal is dismissed in all other respects."

Flowchart preview
👍
0
0 comments0 shares

Sign in to view and post comments.