Bifalgorithm post · Fuscalite · Nuvei v. Arrap - NSW Supreme Court finds that a post-closing voluntary disclosure by the target so as to deplete escrowed funds did not violate a duty to cooperate with the vendor
Escrow Funds
Escrow Funds (Fuscalite · Nuvei v. Arrap - NSW Supreme Court finds that a post-closing voluntary disclosure by the target so as to deplete escrowed funds did n…
Ideas in this flowchart
- Nuvei and Arrap used an escrow arrangement to address potential additional withholding tax in the share purchase.
- Before closing, Nuvei was purchasing the shares of an Australian company from Arrap.
- The Company’s deemed dividend may have been subject to a 30% non-treaty withholding rate instead of the generally applicable 15% Australia-U.S. Treaty rate.
- The investors had not established that the ultimate owners of the US LLC and LLP recipients were US residents.
- Nuvei and Arrap agreed to place part of the purchase price into escrow.
- The escrow was intended to cover the potential additional withholding tax liability.
- The escrow period was 18 months.
- The Australian Taxation Office could determine during that period that the additional withholding tax was payable.
- If there was no such determination within 18 months, the escrowed funds would be released to Arrap.