Bifalgorithm post · Fuscalite · A post-spinoff amalgamation may taint the spin-off
Shareholding Spin-off
Shareholding Spin-off (Fuscalite · A post-spinoff amalgamation may taint the spin-off) — "Suppose that a wholly owned Holdco of an individual owns 100% of Opco…
Ideas in this flowchart
- Tax treatment of the proposed spin-off and subsequent amalgamation
- Initial ownership structure
- An individual wholly owns Holdco
- Holdco owns 100% of Opco and 70% of Subco, while unrelated persons own the remaining 30%
- Proposed steps to spin off the 70% Subco shareholding
- The individual rolls a portion of his Holdco shares to Newco
- Holdco rolls its 70% Subco shareholding to Newco in exchange for Newco shares
- The cross-shareholdings are redeemed
- Because the unrelated persons’ 30% shareholding is unaffected, none of ss. 55(3)(a)(i) to (v) are engaged and the s. 55(3)(a) exemption applies
- Alternative final step: Newco and Subco amalgamate
- The amalgamation triggers s. 55(3)(a)(ii)
- By receiving shares of Amalco, the unrelated persons are effectively deemed under s. 55(3.01)(b) to have acquired a 30% interest in Newco