Bifalgorithm post · Une erreur comptable peut-elle entraîner un impôt supplémentaire? · A post-spinoff amalgamation may taint the spin-off
Safe Harbour
Safe Harbour (Une erreur comptable peut-elle entraîner un impôt supplémentaire? · A post-spinoff amalgamation may taint the spin-off) — "S. 55(3.01)(b), deemin…
Ideas in this flowchart
- Access to the s. 55(3)(a) safe harbour in an amalgamation and spin-off structure
- S. 55(3.01)(b) may deem an amalgamated corporation to be a continuation of each predecessor for s. 55(3)(a) purposes.
- The example involves a proposed spin-off of Holdco’s interest in Subco.
- An individual wholly owns Holdco; Holdco owns 100% of Opco and 70% of Subco, while unrelated persons own the remaining 30% of Subco.
- The objective is to spin off Holdco’s 70% shareholding in Subco.
- The spin-off is implemented through a series of related transactions.
- The individual rolls a portion of the Holdco shares to Newco.
- Holdco rolls its 70% shareholding in Subco to Newco in exchange for Newco shares.
- The cross-shareholdings are redeemed.
- The unrelated persons’ 30% shareholding remains unaffected.
- As a result, none of s. 55(3)(a)(i) to (v) is engaged.
- The s. 55(3)(a) exemption applies.