Bifalgorithm post · Une erreur comptable peut-elle entraîner un impôt supplémentaire? · A post-spinoff amalgamation may taint the spin-off

Safe Harbour

Safe Harbour (Une erreur comptable peut-elle entraîner un impôt supplémentaire? · A post-spinoff amalgamation may taint the spin-off) — "S. 55(3.01)(b), deemin…

Ideas in this flowchart

  • Access to the s. 55(3)(a) safe harbour in an amalgamation and spin-off structure
  • S. 55(3.01)(b) may deem an amalgamated corporation to be a continuation of each predecessor for s. 55(3)(a) purposes.
  • The example involves a proposed spin-off of Holdco’s interest in Subco.
  • An individual wholly owns Holdco; Holdco owns 100% of Opco and 70% of Subco, while unrelated persons own the remaining 30% of Subco.
  • The objective is to spin off Holdco’s 70% shareholding in Subco.
  • The spin-off is implemented through a series of related transactions.
  • The individual rolls a portion of the Holdco shares to Newco.
  • Holdco rolls its 70% shareholding in Subco to Newco in exchange for Newco shares.
  • The cross-shareholdings are redeemed.
  • The unrelated persons’ 30% shareholding remains unaffected.
  • As a result, none of s. 55(3)(a)(i) to (v) is engaged.
  • The s. 55(3)(a) exemption applies.
Feed/

Safe Harbour

No cover

Channel

Une erreur comptable peut-elle entraîner un impôt supplémentaire?

1 page

"S. 55(3.01)(b), deeming an amalgamated corporation to be a continuation of each predecessor for s. 55(3)(a) purposes, can potentially preclude access to the s. 55(3)(a) safe harbour.\n\nSuppose that a wholly owned Holdco of an individual owns 100% of Opco and 70% of Subco, with the remaining 30% held by unrelated persons. In order to spin-off the 70% shareholding:\n\nthe individual rolls a portion of his Holdco shares to a Newco;\n\nHoldco rolls its 70% shareholding to Newco in exchange for Newco shares; and\n\nthe cross-shareholdings are redeemed.\n\nGiven inter alia that the 30% shareholding of the unrelated persons is unaffected, none of ss. 55(3)(a)(i) to (v) are engaged, and the s. 55(3)(a) exemption applies."

Flowchart preview
👍
0
0 comments0 shares

Sign in to view and post comments.