Bifalgorithm post · Test ebook pdf · Planning a Diet

What is 213 “New study shows that margarine contributes to arterial plaque?

What is 213 “New study shows that margarine contributes to arterial plaque? (Test ebook pdf · Planning a Diet) — "213 “New study shows that margarine contribut…

Ideas in this flowchart

  • Evaluar críticamente las noticias y afirmaciones nutricionales
  • Ejemplos: afirmaciones sobre la margarina y el café
  • Un solo estudio no demuestra ni refuta un hecho
  • Las afirmaciones aisladas pueden causar desinformación
  • Criterios para evaluar un estudio científico
  • El estudio debe publicarse en una revista revisada por pares
  • El informe debe explicar los métodos utilizados
  • Es necesario conocer quiénes fueron los sujetos del estudio
  • Los resultados deben analizarse junto con investigaciones previas
  • Hay que valorar si la conclusión tiene sentido para el consumidor
  • Debe consultarse el artículo original para comprobar las conclusiones
  • Criterios para evaluar la validez de un sitio web
  • Identificar quién patrocina el sitio web
  • Comprobar si aparecen los nombres y las credenciales
  • Comprobar si se identifica un consejo editorial
Feed/

What is 213 “New study shows that margarine contributes to arterial plaque?

No cover

Channel

Test ebook pdf

1 page

"213 “New study shows that margarine contributes to arterial plaque.” “Asian study reveals that two cups of coffee per day can have detrimental effects on the nervous system.” How do you react whe n you read news of this nature? Do you boycott margarine and coffee? When reading nutrition - related claims, articles, websites, or advertisements always remember that one study does not substantiate a fact. One study neither proves nor disproves anything. Readers who may be looking for complex answers to nutritional dilemmas can quickly misconstrue such statements and be led down a path of misinformation. Listed below are ways that you can develop discerning eyes when reading nutritional news. • The scientifi c study under discussion should be published in a peer - reviewed journal, such as the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition . Question studies that come from less trustworthy sources (such as non peer - reviewed journals or websites) or that are not published. • The report should disclose the methods used by the researcher(s). Did the study last for three or thirty weeks? Were there ten or one hundred participants? What did the participants actually do? Did the researcher(s) observe the results themselves or did they rely on self - reports from program participants? • Who were the subjects of this study? Humans or animals? If human, are any traits/characteristics noted? You may realize you have more in common with certain program participants and c an use that as a basis to gauge if the study applies to you. • Credible reports often disseminate new findings in the context of previous research. A single study on its own gives you very limited information, but if a body of literature supports a finding, it gives you more confidence in it. • Peer - reviewed articles deliver a broad perspective and are inclusive of findings of many studies on the exact same subject. • When reading such news, ask yourself, “Is this making sense?” Even if coffee does adversely affe ct the nervous system, do you drink enough of it to see any negative effects? Remember, if a headline professes a new remedy for a nutrition - related topic, it may well be a research - supported piece of news, but more often than not it is a sensational story designed to catch the attention of an unsuspecting consumer. Track down the original journal article to see if it really supports the conclusions being drawn in the news report. When reading information on websites, remember the following criteria for dis cerning if the site is valid: • Who sponsors the website? • Are names and credentials disclosed? • Is an editorial board identified?"

Flowchart preview
👍
0
0 comments0 shares

Sign in to view and post comments.