Bifalgorithm post · Brisk · Chapter 1

Why are ordered pairs different from sets?

Why are ordered pairs different from sets? (Brisk · Chapter 1) — "You’ll remember from high school algebra the notion of an ordered pair (x, y). We dealt with…

Ideas in this flowchart

  • Notion of an ordered pair
  • An ordered pair specifies a point to plot on a graph
  • The first element gives the distance from the origin on the x-axis
  • The second element gives the distance from the origin on the y-axis
  • An ordered pair is not a set because its elements have an order
  • (3, −4) is not equal to (−4, 3)
  • Curly braces denote sets, while parentheses denote ordered pairs
  • The term “coordinate” is associated with geometric plotting
  • The constituent parts are called “elements” to keep the terminology general
  • Ordered pairs remain useful even when their elements are not plotted
Feed/

Why are ordered pairs different from sets?

Channel

Brisk

1 page

"You’ll remember from high school algebra the notion of an ordered pair (x, y). We dealt with those when we wanted to specify a point to plot on a graph: the first coordinate gave the distance from the origin on the x-axis, and the second coordinate on the y-axis. Clearly an ordered pair is not a set, because as the name implies it is ordered: (3, −4) ≠ (−4, 3). For this reason, we’ll be very careful to use curly braces to denote sets, and parentheses to denote ordered pairs. By the way, although the word “coordinate” is often used to describe the elements of an ordered pair, that’s really a geometry-centric word that implies a visual plot of some kind. Normally we won’t be plotting elements like that, but we will still have use to deal with ordered pairs. I’ll just call the constituent parts “elements” to make it more general."

Flowchart preview
Series cover
👍
0
0 comments0 shares

Sign in to view and post comments.