Bifalgorithm post · Brisk · Chapter 1

How can a relation be defined extensionally or intensionally?

How can a relation be defined extensionally or intensionally? (Brisk · Chapter 1) — "Just as with sets, we can define a relation extensionally or intensionally…

Ideas in this flowchart

  • Les relations peuvent être définies extensionnellement ou intentionnellement.
  • Une définition extensionnelle consiste à lister les couples ordonnés de la relation.
  • Exemple de couples ordonnés : (Hermione, Mt. Dew), (Hermione, Dr. Pepper) et (Harry, Dr. Pepper).
  • Les mêmes informations peuvent aussi être écrites sous forme d’énoncés comme « Harry a goûté Dr. Pepper ».
  • Une définition intentionnelle donne à la relation une signification générale.
  • La relation « hasTasted » est définie entre les ensembles X et Y.
  • La relation « hasTasted » contient cinq des six couples ordonnés possibles.
  • Si x a goûté y, alors la personne x a réellement essayé une canette de y.
  • Ainsi, Ron et Hermione ont goûté les deux boissons, tandis que Harry n’a pas goûté Mt. Dew.
Feed/

How can a relation be defined extensionally or intensionally?

Channel

Brisk

1 page

"Just as with sets, we can define a relation extensionally or intensionally. To do it extensionally, it’s just like the examples above — we simply list the ordered pairs: { (Hermione, Mt. Dew), (Hermione, Dr. Pepper), (Harry, Dr. Pepper) }. Most of the time, however, we want a relation to mean something. In other words, it’s not just some arbitrary selection of the possible ordered pairs, but rather reflects some larger notion of how the elements of the two sets are related. For example, suppose I wanted to define a relation called “hasTasted” between the sets X and Y, above. This relation might have the five of the possible six ordered pairs in it: (Harry, Dr. Pepper) (Ron, Dr. Pepper) (Ron, Mt. Dew) (Hermione, Dr. Pepper) (Hermione, Mt. Dew) Another way of expressing the same information would be to write: Harry hasTasted Dr. Pepper Harry hasTasted Mt. Dew Ron hasTasted Dr. Pepper Ron hasTasted Mt. Dew Hermione hasTasted Dr. Pepper Hermione hasTasted Mt. Dew. Both of these are extensional definitions. But of course the meaning behind the relation “hasTasted” is that if x hasTasted y, then in real life, the person x has given a can of y a try. We’re using this relation to state that although Ron and Hermione have sampled both drinks, Harry (perhaps because of his persecuted childhood at the Dursleys) has not."

Flowchart preview
Series cover
👍
0
0 comments0 shares

Sign in to view and post comments.