Bifalgorithm post · IntroductionToBusiness OP 8D04gAa · 2026-10-07-36573 · Hot Links Address Book

What happened to the revised EEO-1 pay-data reporting requirement?

What happened to the revised EEO-1 pay-data reporting requirement? (IntroductionToBusiness OP 8D04gAa · 2026-10-07-36573 · Hot Links Address Book) — "In contra…

Ideas in this flowchart

  • In contrast, little was reported about the reversal of the revised EEO-1 pay-data reporting regulation.
  • The regulation was designed to combat the wage gap between men and women.
  • The revised EEO-1 would have taken effect on March 31, 2018, covering companies with at least 100 employees and federal contractors with at least 50.
  • Covered employers would have reported W-2 wage information and total hours worked for all employees.
  • The EEO-1 form already required reporting on employees’ race, ethnicity, and gender.
  • The OMB initiated a review and immediate stay under its authority through the Paperwork Reduction Act, reversing the September 29, 2016 revision.
  • Pay equity advocates who supported expanded pay-data reporting criticized the suspension.
  • Fatima Goss Graves called the suspension an attack on equal pay that signaled employers could ignore pay inequities.
Feed/

What happened to the revised EEO-1 pay-data reporting requirement?

No cover

Channel

IntroductionToBusiness OP 8D04gAa · 2026-10-07-36573

1 page

"In contrast, little was reported on the reversal of the new regulation designed to combat the wage gap between men and women. The revised EEO-1 would have gone into effect March 31, 2018, and required companies with 100 or more employees and federal contractors with 50 or more employees to report W-2 wage information and total hours worked for all employees. The EEO-1 form already requires employers to report data on race/ethnicity and gender. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) initiated a review and immediate stay to the U.S. EEOC “in accordance with its authority under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),” reversing the regulation that had been revised on September 29, 2016. Pay equity advocates who had supported expanded pay-data reporting were critical of the suspension. “We see through the Trump administration’s call to halt the equal pay rule that requires employers to collect and submit pay data by gender, race, and ethnicity to the government,” said Fatima Goss Graves, president and CEO of the National Women’s Law Center in Washington, D.C. “Make no mistake—it’s an all-out attack on equal pay. [It] sends a clear message to employers: if you want to ignore pay inequities and sweep them under the rug, this administration has your back.”"

Flowchart preview
👍
0
0 comments0 shares

Sign in to view and post comments.