Concept
House Construction
Youngman v. The Queen, 90 DTC 6322, [1990] 2 CTC 10 (FCA) | Tax Interpretations / Case tabs
"The appellant was a chartered accountant and licensed trustee in bankruptcy and one of the main shareholders of Andrich Developments Limited, an Ontario company incorporated for various purposes including land development. The appellant and his wife each owned 35 per cent of the company's shares, with the remainder belonging to their three children. In 1966, the company acquired a 16-acre parcel of land near Guelph with the purpose of subdividing it into residential building lots, but the municipal authorities did not approve the project, which by the summer of 1978 appeared doomed to failure. In 1977, the appellant conceived the idea of having the company build a larger and more luxurious house for him on its land. He and his wife designed the new house and hired a draftsman to prepare the blueprints under their direction. In the fall of 1977, the company entered into a cost-plus building contract for construction of the house, initially estimated to cost approximately $250,000. The house was finished in December 1978, and its final cost amounted to $395,549."
Related Ideas
- Benefit ValuationYoungman v. The Queen, 90 DTC 6322, [1990] 2 CTC 10 (FCA) | Tax Interpretations · Case tabs
- Rental EvidenceYoungman v. The Queen, 90 DTC 6322, [1990] 2 CTC 10 (FCA) | Tax Interpretations · Case tabs
- Bookkeeping ErrorChopp v. R., 98 DTC 6014, [1998] 1 CTC 407 (FCA) · Case tabs
- Benefit PrincipleChopp v. R., 98 DTC 6014, [1998] 1 CTC 407 (FCA) · Case tabs
- Tax CourtChopp v. R., 98 DTC 6014, [1998] 1 CTC 407 (FCA) · Case tabs
- Loan RecordsDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · A. Burden of Proof
- Shareholder BenefitsDeyab v. Canada, 2020 FCA 222 · II. Decision of the Tax Court
- Court Decisions5 May 2026 Roundtable, 2026-1089311C6 - 2026 CALU - Q.2 - Beneficiary designations and taxable benefits | Tax Interpretations · View modes